1月27日,旅客在南京火车站出行。当日是春节假期最后一天,长三角铁路迎来返程客流。 中新社记者 泱波 摄
流动的中国 出行人次快速增长
这个春节,人口大迁徙再次上演,坐火车、飞机出行的人明显变多了。
中国民航局数据显示,春节假期七天民航运输旅客900万人次,比2022年春节同期增长79.8%。春节假期七天民航平均客座率达76%,比2022年增长20个百分点。进出港旅客量较高的机场有广州、深圳、重庆、北京、昆明、西安、上海、杭州、成都等主要客源地和目的地城市。
春节假期,铁路客流继续保持回升态势。1月21日至27日,全国铁路发送旅客5017.4万人次,日均发送716.8万人次,同比增长57.0%,恢复至2019年的83.1%,其中1月26日、27日迎来返程客流高峰,连续2天突破千万人次。
出入境的人次也变多了。春节期间,全国移民管理机构共查验出入境人员287.7万人次,日均41万人次,较去年春节同期增长120.5%。其中,入境143.4万人次,较去年春节同期增长123.2%;出境144.3万人次,较去年春节同期增长117.8%。
3.08亿人次出游 长线游复苏
经文化和旅游部数据中心测算,今年春节假期全国国内旅游出游3.08亿人次,同比增长23.1%,恢复至2019年同期的88.6%;实现国内旅游收入3758.43亿元,同比增长30%,恢复至2019年同期的73.1%。
国内多个热门景区再现游客“爆满”的景象。国内长线游市场在今年春节假期迎来了强劲复苏。
在北京工作的白领郑女士,带着孩子去了漠河,全家来到中国最北的地方旅游。她对中新财经表示:“祖国那么大,要带孩子去看一看,感受最北、最南、最东、最西的地方。我们还特意去了最北的哨所,就是为了感受一下军人的生活。”
携程数据显示,平台兔年春节国内外的景区门票订单皆迎来三年新高。其中,国内各大景区门票预订量同比涨3.2倍。跨省酒店预订占比近7成,预订量反超2019年春节。
出境游有序恢复 整体订单大增
随着出境游的有序恢复,跨境游订单大增。携程数据显示,春节期间出境游整体订单同比增长640%,内地旅客预订境外酒店订单量同比增长超4倍,跨境机票订单增长4倍以上。
东南亚成春节档“大赢家”,曼谷、新加坡、吉隆坡、清迈、马尼拉、巴厘岛等成为最受中国旅客欢迎的跨国旅行目的地,均为东南亚目的地。
同程旅行大数据也显示,2023年春节期间,出入境机票订单量大幅上涨,其中出境机票预订量同比上涨258%,入境机票预订量同比上涨632%。国际酒店预订量也同比增长了177%。
今年春节假期,程晓(化名)就选择去了泰国旅游。“非常开心和激动,我搭乘的飞机基本载满了游客,能感受到大家今年能外出旅游兴奋的心情。同时,海外旅游业者、服务人员也非常欢迎中国游客,他们也在积极准备,希望旅游团开放后迎接更多中国游客的到来。”
程晓此行机票和住宿花费较多,两个人出游,人均往返机票近7千元。由于1月是普吉岛的旅游旺季,住宿每晚超千元。不过程晓说,“泰国热带海岛更具风情,美食和服务便宜,性价比更高。”
“春节旅游热度有目共睹,以此为起点,相信中国旅客的旅游消费信心和消费潜能将加速释放,今年的旅游市场将会见到可观的复苏。”携程研究院战略研究中心高级研究员沈佳旎说。(完)
中新网评:处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称,将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对,企图将核污水“一倒了之”,把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。 ![]() 2011年,福岛核电站事故发生后,大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋,对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害,数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日,作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由,在2021年4月13日,正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多,日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称,这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全,甚至“可以喝”,这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上,经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质,核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收,长期来看,将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁,最终危害人类健康。 因此,核污水排海计划推出后,遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示,福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中,约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场,反对该计划。 日本政府认为,核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案,但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海,核污水会随着洋流流动,其影响势必会跨越国界,危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称,相关研究认为,福岛核污水如果排放入海,约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域,该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告,若日本将所有核污水排入海中,不到半年,整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁,包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国,有义务保护海洋环境。然而,在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上,日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估,但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论,并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下,日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设,这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道,日本必须正视各方合理关切,在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后,制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远,若只顾眼前,执意将核污水排放入海,不仅其自身,周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单,其后果必将会危害数代人。 ![]() Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. ![]()
|